Tag >> trademark
The 35th Federal Court issued a decision on the case between the Brazilian company LG Informática Ltd and a global manufacturer LG.
According to court LG Informática Ltd use the name commercially earlier than registered marks owned by LG Electronics Group in Brazil. Therefore, the court considers that these marks should be cancelled in their part of computers and computer equipment in class 9. Moreover, 5 new LG's applications for trade mark should be rejected by the Patent Office in the country in respect of those goods. For other classes, the court allowed the registration of marks.
Most likely, this decision will be appealed because it is seriously affecting the interests of LG Electronics Group for goods such as computers and computer equipment, where the company is very strong.
Posted by: Ventsi Ventsi in trademark search, trademark registration, trademark, Trade Marks, Trade Mark, Patents, IP litigation, IP day, infringment, infringement, Design, Chaina on
Feb 10, 2010
Duncanbucknell.com reported for available database with court decisions on intellectual property in China.
The database provides information on the outcome of court cases, what were the decisions of the court, what was the compensation and so on.
Database that has a version in English can be found here. Intellectual Property Planet
Posted by: Arturo Reyes in well-known marks, Well Known Marks, unregistered marks, Trademarks, trademark registration, trademark, Trade Marks, Trade Mark, Reyes Fenig, Mexico, IP litigation, infringement, enforceability on
Jan 04, 2010
Mexico, as most civil-law countries, follows the first-to-file principle; it means that the first to file has priority to obtain the trademark registration, hence, to be acknowledged as proprietor of the trademark. Nevertheless, Mexico acknowledges certain rights and defenses for the users of non-registered trademarks; Mexico also allows applicants to claim a date of commencement of use in Mexico, in order to obtain some benefits after the issuance of the trademark registration. In any case, these rights and defenses should not be construed as common-law rights (there is no common-law in Mexico) or exceptions to the first-to-file principle: the first applicant has priority to get the trademark registration, no matter who claimed the earliest date of first use or if the earliest applicant
Posted by: Arturo Reyes in Trademarks, trademark registration, trademark, Trade Marks, Trade Mark, Reyes Fenig, Mexico, licensing, Lawsuits, law, IP litigation, INTA, appeal on
Nov 06, 2009
The INTA Bulletin of July 209 (Vol. 64 No. 12) informed that the International Trademark Association (INTA) filed an amicus brief with the Specialized Chamber in Intellectual Property of the Federal Court of Tax and Administrative Affairs (FCTAA), in connection with an appeal filed against the Mexican Patent and Trademark Office (MPTO). According to the bulletin, the basic purpose of the amicus brief was to persuade the FCTAA to "reverse the decision rendered by IMPI (the Spanish acronym for the MPTO) and to interpret the law to provide Mexican trademark owners with the right to seek cancellation of a registration on the ground of bad faith, a right currently enjoyed by foreign trademark owners." Of course, as a Mexican lawyer, it was interesting to learn that INTA was involved in a Mexican
Originally published at Russian Patents blog Back in August 2009 we introduced an optional service – free trademark search in Russia. My opinion on what free search is good for is known and well worded directly at the page we offer the service at. Since August we received only one inquiry for free search in Russian trademarks (as compared to tens of inquiries for regular Russian trademark search) – and results of the free search only cemented my opinion that free trademark search in Russia being total and complete waste of time and totally misleading. Here is the story – rather short, and structured in the table for your convinience. | | Client: | Patents from RU: | | 1 | My employer has asked me to determine whether we will be able to trademark our company & product name, OurCompanyProduct, |
The Mexican statutes do not stipulate any provision regarding trademark coexistence agreements and letters of consent. Nevertheless, these instruments have been widely used to prevent or overcome objections from the Mexican Patent and Trademark Office (MPTO) associated to applications for trademarks identical or confusingly similar to earlier registered or applied ones, protecting the same or similar products or services. The Industrial Property Law provides that the MPTO will reject a trademark application when the trademark is identical or confusingly similar to an earlier registered or applied one, to cover the same or similar goods or services. Owners of existing registrations are allowed to apply for the registration of an identical trademark to protect goods/services similar to those
Posted by: Arturo Reyes in trademark, Trade Mark, Reyes Fenig, Patents, patent, Mexico, Legistlation, Lawsuits, law, IP litigation, intellectual property on
Jan 29, 2009
On January 5, 2009, the Chamber specialized in intellectual property matters of the the Federal Court of Tax and Administrative Affairs (FCTAA) started working. The Mexican Patent and Trademark Office (MPTO) is the first instance in most IP matters (registration, administrative enforcement and validity of IP rights). For the second instance, the appellant has three alternatives available: (i) a petition for administrative review with a higher rank official of the MPTO itself (usually a waste of time); (ii) an amparo appeal with a Federal District Court; (iii) or an appeal with the FCTAA. The appeal with the FCTAA is the most usual. The tribunal colegiado de circuito or federal court of appeals will continue being the final instance. The FCTAA has jurisdiction to decide cases in a wide range
Interested about intellectual property related blog posts or looking for some specific topic, but don't have time enough to check your rss feed reader or browse all those magnificent patent, trademark, etc blogs? No problem, now you can search within more than 300 blogs by using IPE's blogroll search . Try it, and you will find lot of interesting topics. And if you like it, you can this search engine to your blog or website. The code is available here . The full list of included intellectual property blogs is available at blogroll of IPEstonia .
The renewal of trademark registrations is an important aspect of the maintenance of any IP portfolio. Making the right decision about renewing (or not renewing) a trademark allows the proprietor to maximize the value of its trademarks, or cut unnecessary expenses. In this post, I am explaining the basic aspects about renewing trademarks in Mexico, calling the reader's attention to two issues that should be carefully considered when the trademark owner decides to renew a trademark registration in our country. The basics about trademark renewal in Mexico A Mexican trademark registration is valid for a ten years term, counted from the filing date in Mexico, regardless the priority, registration or first-use date. The registration may be renewed an unlimited number of times for ten years
(Originally posted at Russian Patents blog ) No doubt, you’ve heard the buzz already - Russian company Superfone and its president Oleg Teterin claim they own the rights to reproduce  emoticon and similar derivatives like  and in spite of their being in public use for at least 15 years. Associated Press says that “The Rospatent federal patent agency (aka Russian Patent Office) tells the RIA-Novosti news agency that the symbol was trademarked only as part of the company’s brand and has not been trademarked on its own.” - but AP, RIA-Novosti and Russian Patent Office representative are all wrong - Teterin INDEED has gotten rights for pure emoticon and not for a combined mark - take a look at RU2007719479 trademark certificate which clearly shows it:
 smiley emoticon trademark
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >> |
|
|
|
 |
Partners |
 |
|
.jpg)
.jpg)
