<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Posts tagged 'cyberlaw'</title>
		<description>Blog Posts tagged 'cyberlaw'</description>
		<link>http://www.relatip.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:06:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>The Beginning of the End? USPTO vs. Software patents</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,The-Beginning-of-the-End-USPTO-vs.-Software-patents.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>  &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Prof. John F. Duffy analyses at Patently-O  the probable position of the USPTO towards software patents as presented in a series of cases. Specifically, patentable subject matter must result in a physical transformation of an article that is tied to a particular machine. A general purpose computer may probably not be regarded as a particular machine, and data structures and numbers (e.g. webpage rankin [...]</description>
			<author>ophir@patentim.com</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>USPTO</category>
 <category>software patent</category>
 <category>Software</category>
 <category>politics</category>
 <category>Patents Opposition</category>
 <category>Patents</category>
 <category>Patently-O</category>
 <category>Patentability</category>
 <category>Patent Prosecution</category>
 <category>Patent Legislation</category>
 <category>patent</category>
 <category>Internet Patent</category>
 <category>intellectual property</category>
 <category>cyberlaw</category>
 <category>Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit</category>
 <category>COMPUTER CONTROLLED SOFTWARE INTEGRATED INVENTIONS</category>
 <category>claims</category>
 <category>CAFC</category>
 <category>blogging</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A growing awareness in China for the need to protect virtual property by law</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,A-growing-awareness-in-China-for-the-need-to-protect-virtual-property-by-law.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>&amp;nbsp; &lt;p&gt;A Chinese court has found a man guilty of stealing online game identities and using them to gain virtual possessions in an online multiplayer historical quest game. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The growing number of virtual property disputes in china has led to a call to legislate more concrete virtual property laws. The need for proper virtual property laws has also arised because of the Chinese government intention to create a massive virtual world network in order to promote Chinese business [...]</description>
			<author>eyval@patentim.com</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:28:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>cyberlaw</category>
 <category>China</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>10 IP related blog posts of the week</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,10-IP-related-blog-posts-of-the-week.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>  &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I&amp;#39;d like to share 10 IP related blog posts that caught my eye in the previous week.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Patents&lt;/u&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify; direction: ltr; unicode-bid [...]</description>
			<author>amit@patentim.com</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:10:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>USPTO</category>
 <category>United States</category>
 <category>United Kingdom</category>
 <category>UK-IPO</category>
 <category>TTab</category>
 <category>Trademarks</category>
 <category>trademark</category>
 <category>private copying</category>
 <category>Patent Legislation</category>
 <category>Inventors</category>
 <category>indefinite articles</category>
 <category>ICANN</category>
 <category>Domain names</category>
 <category>domain name tasting</category>
 <category>defences</category>
 <category>cyberlaw</category>
 <category>Copyright defences</category>
 <category>copyright</category>
 <category>consultation</category>
 <category>claims</category>
 <category>blogging</category>
 <category>Australia</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>