<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Posts tagged 'consultation'</title>
		<description>Blog Posts tagged 'consultation'</description>
		<link>http://www.relatip.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:53:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Opposing pending patent applications in the US</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,Opposing-pending-patent-applications-in-the-US.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;A possibility for opposing pending patent applications in the US is presented by Dennis Crouch in his blog Patently-O  under the title &amp;quot;poor-man&amp;#39;s opposition proceedings &amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The US law does not allow opposing a patent application (in contrary e.g. to israeli procedures which are partly based on receiving third party&amp;#39;s oppositions), however they do commit applicants to submit to the patent office any relevant subject matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, the procedure comprises sending such [...]</description>
			<author>ophir@patentim.com</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>USPTO</category>
 <category>United States</category>
 <category>prosecution</category>
 <category>Patents Opposition</category>
 <category>Patents</category>
 <category>Patently-O</category>
 <category>Patent search</category>
 <category>Patent Prosecution</category>
 <category>patent opposition</category>
 <category>patent</category>
 <category>oppositions</category>
 <category>intellectual property</category>
 <category>consultation</category>
 <category>blogging</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>10 IP related blog posts of the week</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,10-IP-related-blog-posts-of-the-week.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>  &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;I&amp;#39;d like to share 10 IP related blog posts that caught my eye in the previous week.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;Patents&lt;/u&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify; direction: ltr; unicode-bid [...]</description>
			<author>amit@patentim.com</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:10:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>USPTO</category>
 <category>United States</category>
 <category>United Kingdom</category>
 <category>UK-IPO</category>
 <category>TTab</category>
 <category>Trademarks</category>
 <category>trademark</category>
 <category>private copying</category>
 <category>Patent Legislation</category>
 <category>Inventors</category>
 <category>indefinite articles</category>
 <category>ICANN</category>
 <category>Domain names</category>
 <category>domain name tasting</category>
 <category>defences</category>
 <category>cyberlaw</category>
 <category>Copyright defences</category>
 <category>copyright</category>
 <category>consultation</category>
 <category>claims</category>
 <category>blogging</category>
 <category>Australia</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>