I'd like to draw your attention to Dennis Crouch's latest posting on Patenly O, presenting an actual estimation of waiting times for a first USPTO Office Action .

I don't know if the statistics refer to all US Applications, i.e. including those filed as a PCT National Phase. As far as I know, Applications filed as a national phase of a PCT Application take longer than Applications originally submitted as a US Application.

Comment (0) Read More...

Prof. John F. Duffy analyses at Patently-O the probable position of the USPTO towards software patents as presented in a series of cases. Specifically, patentable subject matter must result in a physical transformation of an article that is tied to a particular machine. A general purpose computer may probably not be regarded as a particular machine, and data structures and numbers (e.g. webpage rankings) may probably neither be regarded as articles nor as being physically transformed. Well – some news for the software industry.

The analysis is recommended as being not only thorough but also quite easy to read.

Comment (0) Read More...

As cleantech develops as an industry, so do cleantech related patents. The Cleantech Group at Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C, publishes a quarterly growth index 

of patents in the field of clean energy. Patents in the field are primarily related to fuel cells and secondarily to wind, sold and hybrid electrical energy in a similar weight, the former are the only field characterized by a continuous growth in patent numbers. Overall the study  includes over 200 US patents per quarter which is quite small. It is important to keep in mind that the current state of the cleantech field may better mirrored by the numbers of patent applications, however these are not published till 18 months after filing, and prosecution may take at least a time period that is similar in duration. The index

Comment (0) Read More...

 A webpage at wipo presents annually selected notable inventors. I would like to share with you some inventions for daily use by these notable inventors

(WO/2001/033409) COMPUTER GENERATED POETRY SYSTEM

by Raymond KURZWEIL;

 

(WO 03/103559) Hybrid Human/Electric Powered Vehicle

and

(WO 02/011641) Apparatus and Method for Cleaning Teeth

by

Dean KAMEN; 

 

(WO 98/049868) LIGHT ENHANCED BULLHORN

and

(WO 03/091099) ROTORCRAFT

by

Elwood Norris;

 

 and finally

 (WO 98/028988) EDIBLE TOY FIGURES CONSTRUCTED OF CEREAL, AND METHOD

and

 (WO 98/038810) DISPOSABLE WIRELESS TELEPHONE AND METHOD

by

Randice-Lisa ALTSCHUL.

 

I hope you have enjoyed!

Comment (0) Read More...

A possibility for opposing pending patent applications in the US is presented by Dennis Crouch in his blog Patently-O under the title "poor-man's opposition proceedings ".

The US law does not allow opposing a patent application (in contrary e.g. to israeli procedures which are partly based on receiving third party's oppositions), however they do commit applicants to submit to the patent office any relevant subject matter.

So, the procedure comprises sending such subject matter to the applicant, thus making him obligated to disclose it to the patent office!

I like this

Comment (0) Read More...

 I would like to recommend the Duncan Bucknell blog , which contains a wealth of information and articles in different IP related themes. The posts are very well organized namely in a weekly report of news from all over the world (with indication of the blogs reporting them) and also in scorecards which hold the items categorized after the relevant firms (e.g. - find all IP issues relating to Apple). Just delve

Comment (1) Read More...

Hello again,

following Biomed 2008 in Israel and after talking to some ex-scientists that have turned to patent drafting, I would like to share with you a word of encouragement. Here's an article from USAToday (from a year ago) indicating that (as David Bowie sings) - we're not alone!

Yours,

Ophir.

Comment (0) Read More...

Qualifications needed to be a patent attorney in different countries:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_attorney

Including: United States, Japan, Europe (EPO), India, Germany, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore and Ireland.

The following document elaborates on the training in the UK:

http://www.prospects.ac.uk/downloads/occprofiles/profile_pdfs/W2_Patent_attorney.pdf

and Axel Horn’s IPJUR reports the situation in France:

http://www.ipjur.com/2007/12/france-profession-of-patent-attorneys.php3

I add that in Israel – A scientific or engineering degree is required, as well as two years’ practice and two examinations.

 

And – I’d like to recommend the list of famous patent attorneys at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_patent_attorneys_and_agents

Comment (0) Read More...

Continuing on Zeev Fisher’s post from January 12, 2008, I’d like to share my pleasure of using Patent Pal. This toolbar holds approximately 25 search engines, 30 blogs, most PTO’s of the world and local information from many countries, as well as writing guides and exam tools. Using it as a standard tool simplifies much of the web related work of patent drafting (e.g. a direct connection to Public PAIR), and encourages getting to know new resources. The supporting team is friendly and ready to add sites and blogs to the toolbar (e.g. Relatip).

So – enjoy!

http://www.thepatentpal.com/

Comment (0) Read More...

 

I would like to share with you a nice citation from "The Invent Blog" commenting the four year anniversary for his blog:

"When I started the blog, I would post on any and everything patent related that I could find…lawsuits, new Federal Circuit cases, funny “TGIF” posts…whatever caught my eye that day. Over the next few weeks-months, Buchanan’s blog, Sorocco’s blog, Crouch’s blog (and other patent blogs) came on the scene. Each new patent blog finding its own niche, pushing the others to find their own niches too. The diversity of patent blogs right

Comment (0) Read More...