<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Posts tagged 'Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit'</title>
		<description>Blog Posts tagged 'Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit'</description>
		<link>http://www.relatip.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:17:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>The Beginning of the End? USPTO vs. Software patents</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,The-Beginning-of-the-End-USPTO-vs.-Software-patents.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>  &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Prof. John F. Duffy analyses at Patently-O  the probable position of the USPTO towards software patents as presented in a series of cases. Specifically, patentable subject matter must result in a physical transformation of an article that is tied to a particular machine. A general purpose computer may probably not be regarded as a particular machine, and data structures and numbers (e.g. webpage rankin [...]</description>
			<author>ophir@patentim.com</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>USPTO</category>
 <category>software patent</category>
 <category>Software</category>
 <category>politics</category>
 <category>Patents Opposition</category>
 <category>Patents</category>
 <category>Patently-O</category>
 <category>Patentability</category>
 <category>Patent Prosecution</category>
 <category>Patent Legislation</category>
 <category>patent</category>
 <category>Internet Patent</category>
 <category>intellectual property</category>
 <category>cyberlaw</category>
 <category>Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit</category>
 <category>COMPUTER CONTROLLED SOFTWARE INTEGRATED INVENTIONS</category>
 <category>claims</category>
 <category>CAFC</category>
 <category>blogging</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Microsoft vs. Alcatel-Lucent US FC</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,Microsoft-vs.-Alcatel-Lucent-US-FC.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>&amp;nbsp; &lt;p dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;Microsoft appealed an earlier jury verdict dated last April, maintaining that Microsoft has infringed a number of Alcatel-Lucent&amp;#39;s patents. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;On Appeal, Judge Marilyn L. Huff refused to reconsider the April jury verdict and ordered Microsoft to pay for additional damages. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<author>mshalem@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>US</category>
 <category>Patents</category>
 <category>patent</category>
 <category>Decision</category>
 <category>Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit</category>
 <category>appeal</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>