<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Posts tagged 'Canada'</title>
		<description>Blog Posts tagged 'Canada'</description>
		<link>http://www.relatip.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:03:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>CIPO's Changes to Patentable Subject Matter May Be Unlawful   - Alistair Forster</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,CIPOs-Changes-to-Patentable-Subject-Matter-May-Be-Unlawful---Alistair-Forster.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>&lt;p style=&quot;margin-bottom: -7px; margin-top: 6px&quot; class=&quot;BodyText&quot; align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;                   &amp;nbsp;In August of 2007, by way                    of a Practice Notice and with little or no consultation with                    the public or the intellectual property community, the                    Canadian Patent Office formally expressed its position that                    computer programs existing in a transitory state (i.e., signal                    claims) are forms of energy that d [...]</description>
			<author>splanchak@mbm.com</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>intellectual property</category>
 <category>Canada</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Subsequent Entry Biologics:   How They Affect Your  Patenting Strategy  - Tanya Weston</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,Subsequent-Entry-Biologics-How-They-Affect-Your-Patenting-Strategy---Tanya-Weston.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>&lt;p style=&quot;margin-bottom: -7px; margin-top: 6px&quot; class=&quot;BodyText&quot; align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;                   Health Canada recently released a                    draft guidance document, for public comment only, in respect                    of a proposed regulatory approval process for Subsequent Entry                    Biologics (SEBs).1 This guidance document is the                    first step in the development of a comprehensive regulatory                    system to address SEBs that will, in a [...]</description>
			<author>splanchak@mbm.com</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>intellectual property</category>
 <category>Canada</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The USPTO continues to expand its Patent Prosecution Highways to Canadian and Korean Patent Offices</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,The-USPTO-continues-to-expand-its-Patent-Prosecution-Highways-to-Canadian-and-Korean-Patent-Offices.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The USPTO continues to expand its infrastructure of Prosecution Highways with foreign countries allowing shorter pending and more efficiency in examination and other prosecution procedures when patent applications are filed and granted in countries that are linked by the Prosecution Highway. Up to current day the USPTO has signed Prosecution Highway agreements with the UK, Japan and the newly joined Canada and Korea. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently, the Israeli Patent Office does not have a Prosecution High [...]</description>
			<author>mshalem@gmail.com</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:03:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>USPTO</category>
 <category>United States</category>
 <category>United Kingdom</category>
 <category>Japan</category>
 <category>Canada</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Patent Prosecution Highway Will Start on January 28, 2008</title>
			<link>http://www.relatip.com/component/option,com_myblog/show,Patent-Prosecution-Highway-Will-Start-on-January-28-2008.html/Itemid,59/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Canadian Intellecutal Property Office (CIPO)&amp;nbsp;announced on Monday, January 14, 2008, that CIPO will launch a one-year Canada-US Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) joint pilot program&amp;nbsp;on January 28, 2008, that will fast-track patent examination at CIPO and will applicants in both countries to obtain corresponding patents faster and more efficiently.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please note that, during thepilot, CIPO will process requests for advance prosecution under the PPH program free of charge.&amp;nb [...]</description>
			<author>taiji.yoshino@nelligan.ca</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:36:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>United States</category>
 <category>Patent Prosecution</category>
 <category>Canada</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>